[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [BNW] OT: Shadowrun

To: bnw@gamerz.net
Subject: Re: [BNW] OT: Shadowrun
From: Sean Michael Whipkey <highway@cstone.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 10:06:03 -0400
References: <20000420161106.96199.qmail@hotmail.com> <002b01bfab7c$1c8a8e00$b6a630d5@knight1> <3.0.5.32.20000422022323.007bde40@pop.nmia.com> <39045D86.68EB4AD3@cstone.net> <007c01bfaf51$7fe9be20$45381b3f@0015874228>
Reply-To: bnw@gamerz.net
Sender: owner-bnw@gamerz.net

"iguana.1031" wrote:
> 
> I've been running Shadowrun since it came out in '89, with less than a year
> total of downtime.  Sure, the system is OK at best, not my first (or fourth)
> choice and far from what I would consider "good" mechanics, but that's not
> why I play.  The story and setting are the key.  After that, everything else
> is just . . . extra.  The system IS playable and, IMHO, no more clunky than
> a lot of the others on the market - including Deadlands.

I do have to admit.  I bought SR 3rd edition the other day.  They've
made the system a heck of a lot better since 1st edition.

SeanMike

--
Sean Michael Whipkey - "I drink a lot of [beer]. Let me be socially 
responsible for a moment: If you are under 21, or driving, or both, then
 you should wait to drink until you turn 21 and/or park the car. And 
you'll want to stay away from Zima regardless." - ack@rpg.net

References:
- Re: [BNW] BNW background
  - From: "Jonathan Weiss" <pyrateking@hotmail.com>
- Re: [BNW] BNW background
  - From: "Malcolm Knight" <malcolm.knight@cableinet.co.uk>
- Re: [BNW] OT: Shadowrun
  - From: Allan Seyberth <darious@darious.com>
- Re: [BNW] OT: Shadowrun
  - From: Sean Michael Whipkey <highway@cstone.net>
- Re: [BNW] OT: Shadowrun
  - From: "iguana.1031" <iguana.1031@gateway.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [BNW] Go-go-gadget.....
Next by Date: Re: [BNW] playing other games with BNW
Prev by thread: Re: [BNW] OT: Shadowrun
Next by thread: RE: [BNW] BNW background
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread