Re: [BNW] Bomber, cool or stupid?

[Theo McGuckin <tsm@jlab.org>]

> The problem is that, of course, giving the Bomber AP to take out the Goliath 
> means he has that AP to even more readily take out everybody else.

Well the Goliath was an example, but in general I was wondering if the
bomber should have AP?

> The Goliath is supposed to be tough.  Although I'll grant that maybe he 
> shouldn't necessary be _that_ tough.  Nonetheless, that's where he's at and 
> I'd be loath to tamper too much with either Package just to make the Bomber 
> more likely to take out the Goliath.

Well the blaster is basically a really good gun. So the bomber could
thought of as a good grenade.
A grenade does 6d6+10 so 50% of the time you'll do at least (looking at
Steve's probability chart...) 19 damage

With the blaster (an arm) you'll do... 35 damage.
And if you use shaped charge you'll do... 50 damage.

So, never mind. The bomber is just fine I guess.

-Theo McGuckin, operations
"We waste more electrons by 6am then most labs make all day. Be all you
can be!"