Re: [risk] "Skewed" combat?

["Ray Pearce" <raypearce@enterprise.net>]

To encourage attacks.
The game would be very boring if every player just dug
themselves in and waited to be attacked.
Giving the advantage to the attacker will make it a much
more 'dynamic' game :-)

hippo

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Bill Bauer <bbauer@thalia.org>
To: <risk-users@gamerz.net>
Sent: 30 March 2000 16:54
Subject: Re: [risk] "Skewed" combat?


> 
>   ummm... I don't think this reflects much reality-wise...
> 
>   It is a given in the military world that the DEFENDER has the advantage
> in any assault. Why would the attacker get the advantage?