Re: [risk] "Skewed" combat?

[Richard Rognlie <rrognlie@gamerz.net>]

Agreed.  It has nothing to do with reality.  It is trying to 
simulate the dice factor of risk without the random factor 
of dice...

But I can be talked into other formulas...

Attacker * .85 vs. defender?


Richard

On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 10:54:49AM -0500, Bill Bauer wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Richard Rognlie wrote:
> 
> > Anyone up for testing the "attacker attacks at 1.16 advantage" aka
> > "skewed" combat?
> 
>   ummm... I don't think this reflects much reality-wise...
> 
>   It is a given in the military world that the DEFENDER has the advantage
> in any assault. Why would the attacker get the advantage?
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bill Bauer                       |         "Viking is a verb, and a
> bbauer@thalia.org          |  ---+---   /  longship is STILL the ultimate
> http://www.thalia.org       \0-0-0-0-0-/   in rowing machines..."
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
> 	unsubscribe risk-users
> as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.
> 

-- 
 /  \__  | Richard Rognlie / Sendmail Consultant / Sendmail, Inc.
 \__/  \ | URL:    http://www.gamerz.net/rrognlie/   
 /  \__/ | 
 \__/    | *BSD and Linux:  The Ultimate Windows NT Service Packs