[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[risk] "Skewed" combat?

To: risk-users@gamerz.net
Subject: [risk] "Skewed" combat?
From: Richard Rognlie <rrognlie@gamerz.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 22:49:15 -0500
Reply-To: risk-users@gamerz.net
Sender: owner-risk-users@gamerz.net

Anyone up for testing the "attacker attacks at 1.16 advantage" aka
"skewed" combat?

Richard

-- 
 /  \__  | Richard Rognlie / Sendmail Consultant / Sendmail, Inc.
 \__/  \ | URL:    http://www.gamerz.net/rrognlie/   
 /  \__/ | 
 \__/    | *BSD and Linux:  The Ultimate Windows NT Service Packs

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [risk] "Skewed" combat?
  - From: Jason Summer <jfsummer@bellatlantic.net>
- Re: [risk] "Skewed" combat?
  - From: Eric Shultz <swift_4@yahoo.com>
- Re: [risk] "Skewed" combat?
  - From: Bill Bauer <bbauer@thalia.org>

Prev by Date: [risk] alternative
Next by Date: Re: [risk] "Skewed" combat?
Prev by thread: [risk] alternative
Next by thread: Re: [risk] "Skewed" combat?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread