Re: [risk] Reinforcements idea

[Eric Shultz <shultz@ici.net>]

Hmmm.  I don't know if I like the idea of reinforcements not occuring
together.  Let's say you're sixth in line for reinforcements.  By the time
the other five players use their reinforcements to beat on you, it doesn't
matter that you get some.

I'd like to play it like this for a while.  I'd be willing to try the other
way, but I think when everyone reinforces, it will tend to cause some
chaos, but it will be balanced chaos.

Eric Shultz
Swift


At 01:36 PM 3/11/00 -0500, Richard Rognlie wrote:
>I just had a thought (rare as they occur, I know...)
>
>Currently, everyone does reinforcements on every 4th turn (this may be
>open for debate later...)  What if each turn, one player reinforces.
>
>E.g. turn 1: everyone deploys normally + player 1 deploys 1/2 his
>normal reinforcements (round up).
>
>Each turn thereafter, the next player in line deploys reinforcements
>and everyone issues moves, too.
>
>It's just an idea... does it have merit?
>
>I'm just thinking in terms of the deployment phase seems to completely
>"jumble" the power structure of the baord...
>
>Richard
>
>-- 
> /  \__  | Richard Rognlie / Sendmail Consultant / Sendmail, Inc.
> \__/  \ | URL:    http://www.gamerz.net/rrognlie/   
> /  \__/ | Give a man a fish, and he'll be hungry tomorrow.  Teach a
> \__/    | man to fish, and he'll be at the river all day drinking beer.
>
>
>To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
>	unsubscribe risk-users
>as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.
>
>