[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [HOE] RE: alternate timelines



Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't the first Junkers come from the SoS (Sons
of Someone [Don't have JMC with me right now]) before the Manitou's stopped
talking. That was their whole thing. They where Huckster/MS (Tool Tricks)
which is kind of what Junkers are, it's just the SoS played with Manitou's
and not Techno-spirits (if there were one or two that survived the nature
spirits then it would have probably look for these guys).

Also we can consider:

S
P
O
I
L
E
R

S
P
A
C
E

Just in case...The Chamber is what's left of the SoS after the war and they
seem more Technoshamans then Junkers. After all they deal with the spirit in
the mountain and extradimentional stuff along with the fact some maintain
their Huckster pasts.

Christopher Merrill
A W.H.A.T.T. Member
----- Original Message -----
From: <AJSolis@aol.com>
To: <hoe@gamerz.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2000 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: [HOE] RE: alternate timelines


>    Has anyone considered what would've happened if mad scientists and
junkers
> coexisted in society instead of one replacing the former?
>    The reason I ask is because I've been toying with the idea of a WoD
> crossover with deadlands, and while there are a few matters that will need
to
> be thought about, the largest one in my mind is the matter of the junkers.
>    For you see, in werewolf the Weaver (fussy maiden aunt of the universe,
> personification of rules, science, technology, order, etc), well she has
the
> upperhand over the wyld (chaos).  Which means that if a deadlands style
> reckoning happened in the world of darkness, even at the time of the
savage
> west, the technospirits would be powerful and numerous enough to patronize
> the junkers from the get go.  Which would mean junkers and mad scientists
> coexisting.
>   So what affect do you guys see that having?
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
> unsubscribe hoe
> as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.
>