RE: [DL] Thoughts on Old Pete {Spoilers}

["Cyvas, Andrew J PR2 (VFA115)" <vfa115.cyvas.a@lincoln.navy.mil>]

No disrespect to the author was intended. If it was perceived, I apologize.
My personal opinion was that Stone should have had more attacks at higher
bonuses in addition to damage reduction. The fact was that the average
player im my party had more going for them statwise than the book gave to
Stone. Also, I am not anti-D20. D20 allows for an infinate number of
crossovers. I am sorry to all those I have offended with my debate on Stone.


-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin L Stoner [mailto:stone1kl@cmich.edu]
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 5:35
To: deadlands@gamerz.net
Subject: RE: [DL] Thoughts on Old Pete {Spoilers}



But killing off Stone... *mumbles*
And I thought I disliked the D20 version before this 
thread....


- Frank - 




Actually the D20 version of way of the dead does not stat 
Stone and I am surprised at your lack of respect in assuming 
that Mr. Jandt(a very fine author indeed) would just throw 
some stats on him so people could kill him. The only thing 
that is offered is a rough rundown of his to hit and damage 
rolls and an idea about his AC, and that he has all harrowed 
powers. This in no way should be demeaning to you or any of 
the anti-d20 coalition. If this marshal statted Stone then he 
did so on his own, all Way of the Dead did was tell you how 
much Stone can mess up your party. Please in the future do 
check your sources before you blame an entire system for your 
unhappiness with a thread.

Marshal Kevin Stoner


To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
	unsubscribe deadlands@gamerz.net
as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.