Re: Simultaneous Risk Questions

[Eric Shultz <shultz@ici.net>]

Actually, that's not too bad an idea.  It would make the
game more strategically oriented.  I would say you should
make Calculated Risk second.  Stay true to the less than
perfect strategy of Risk.

I learned Risk from a friend's older brother on the original
set.  If you spent too much time thinking, he would say
"Just grab your balls and roll, Dammit!"  You gotta have
that attitude in simultaneous risk.  You have to have some
idiot attack your five armies with only one, just for the
hell of it, because the idiot might win.

Eric Shultz
Swift
"Future Simultaneous Risk and Calculated Risk King"