Re: [HOE] Quick Commo question... [Allan/Shane]

[Sam & Max <samnmax@swbell.net>]

Kai Tave wrote:
> 
> Someone mentioned something like this in the "proving Harrowed are Harrowed"
> discussion, and I've been wondering it for a little while myself...
> 
> Do basic Sensor devices ALWAYS need Commo for the user to be able to see
> what's going on?  The book is just a LITTLE unclear on what Commo is and
> isn't necessary for.  The only example in the book is the Motion Detector in
> the back; it DOESN'T have the Commo power, yet still works.  BUT, I don't
> entirely trust the premade devices in the back for a completely accurate
> assessment.
> 
> So do you need to use Commo when making sensors like that, or does Sensor
> automatically provide some way to interpret the readings?
> 
> --Kai Tave

	Boy this was a pain we we first started working with TJmC. The distinction is
difficult and the example in the book are indeed flakey when trying to reverse
engineer them. I have always required it for the devices the posse's junker have
built. 
	Some examples of items built this way are here. http://mscof.home.texas.net/hellonearth/junkers/coolstuff1.htm
	

-- 
David Heth 
"Sniper rifles have been known to cause Spontaneous Brain Rejection(SBR) at
several hundred yards. "