Re: [HoE] Fortitude Ruling Response (long)(now shorter)

[Darrin Bright <darrin@neobright.net>]

At 05:58 PM 11/22/99 -0500, you wrote:
>Hey Gang,
>
>I've been forwarding your responses to my player's (Jesse VanValkenburg)
>"rant" on our group's misinterpretation on Fortitude since he's not on
>the list (perhaps he should be...have to send him the info), and he sent
>back the following replies.  I should state for the record that Jesse
>also Marshals HoE and plays in my campaign (and he's not currently a
>Syker).  Here you go. From here on out, its Jesse's words - not mine:

*rant deleted*

Actually, I've deleted most of this thread. Now, I may be completely wrong
here, but the recent ruling on Fortitude is NOT that recent. As I seem to
recall (and I may not recall very correctly), the ruling on Fortitude and
how it works was clarified shortly after Brainburners came out. So, as Mr.
Prosser or Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz would say, "You've had plenty of time to
lodge a formal complaint."

But please, pass this on to your friend... get over it. This ruling was
made many, many months ago. I'm pretty sure it's in the accumulated
rulings. I don't understand what the fuss is all about. Play your game the
way YOU want to play it.

(You should have seen the shock on our faces when we were playing Deadlands
for over a year and then we discovered you reroll aces on damage rolls.)