[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [HoE] [Hoe] JunkGuyver Thoughts
Once you got the rules worked you make it a MacGuyver Archetype and post it
or submit it to PEG.
As for W.H.A.T.T. It's my gaming organization's name...World Hoppers and
Time Travelers. Most of the members have moved on so we're trying to
rebuild.
Christopher Merrill
W.H.A.T.T. Member
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Steflik <grifflik@stny.rr.com>
To: hoe@gamerz.net <hoe@gamerz.net>
Date: Monday, July 19, 1999 11:59 AM
Subject: [HoE] [Hoe] JunkGuyver Thoughts
>Richard Ranallo wrote:
>
>> Well, the Thaumaturgical Diffusion book is about the Mad Scientist
Hucksters
>> that later spawned junkers. The hexes in the book deal with the
>> inventing/building process. The particular hex I mentioned, Infernal
Machine,
>> allowed a huckster to turn a pile of random compontents into as
functioning
>> gizmo (sound familiar?). The hex has a speed of 1 minute, and the device
falls
>> apart as soon as the huckster stops maintaining it.
>>
>And Christopher Merrill wrote:
>
>> Ya Thaumaturgical Diffusion has Hexes for Mad Scientist, but I don't see
why
>> they can't be adopted by Junkers or refined by said Junkers. As for any
>> other Hex any where for a Junker/Huckster, I can't think of one. If your
out
>> to make a MacGuyver the way we said don't bather with the other
Hexes...at
>> least at first (I love the way Hucksters & Hexes is written & would
>> recommend it to any one).
>>
> Good tip guys - this does indeed sound like what I'm looking for.
>Thanks for the clarification. We had our regular Sunday night session
>last night and one of the guys does have City of Gloom so I'll be able
>to take a look at it. I'll keep the list posted on what I come up with
>- have to do some more reading, rules crunching and possibly some play
>testing first (I have one player that loves weird, quirky stuff and
>liked the sound of the idea). If anyone has more input along the lines
>of this concept feel free to send it my way.
>
> Oh yeah, please excuse my ignorance, but what's W.H.A.T.T. ?
>
>Matt "Would Legos be considered structural components?" Steflik
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
> unsubscribe hoe
>as the BODY of the message. The SUBJECT is ignored.
>