Re: [HoE] Templar Bad Behavior?

["Alex Karls" <seventhirtyfour@hotmail.com>]

<<This is a tough one. Your Templar WAS playing out his hinderance. If 
the Templar character felt remorse for his bestial actions I would let 
him slide. But we are talking about him saying this to the other 
players.  Expressing remorse. If he doesn't even feel just a little bad 
about his actions, zap him. Let him start down the path of 
Servitor-hood, but since it's early let him redeem himself. If possible 
make that a side quest for the party. Hope these sugestions help.
-ruben>>

Yes, its good to give the servitor mark, and allow for redemption.

No, it is not good to use Bloodthirsty as an excuse.  I've already had 2 
players in my game take Bloodthirsty and Loyal just so they could kill 
anything (and I mean anything) that f&*(ed with the party, and not feel 
bad about it.  Suffice to say they are either gone from the game or 
playing different characters.  Bloodthirsty is probably one of the 
cheesiest Hinderances in the book, and should only be allowed for people 
who intend to roleplay and not turn a Hinderance into an Edge.

Comments, Questions?

Alex (Keeper of the Petrified Chicken)



______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com