[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [haggis] Prediction

To: Haggis <haggis-users@gamerz.net>
Subject: RE: [haggis] Prediction
From: "Reed, Jim" <jim_reed@mentorg.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:24:15 -0400
Sender: owner-haggis-users@gamerz.net

> > There's gonna be some screaming when this game is over.
> >
> 
> Not really screaming.  Just some "Gee. One rule overriding
> all the other rules seems a little unbalancing."
>
> I would also add now that two people knew the rule and
> weren't going to trade it for anything.

No true.  Idaho was giving the rule away with "good" trades.  That reduced
the potential number of people who would consider trading with me.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [haggis] Prediction
  - From: Eric Shultz <swift_4@yahoo.com>
- Re: [haggis] Prediction
  - From: Ted Rathkopf <ted-pbmserv-lists@rathkopf.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [haggis] Prediction
Next by Date: Re: [haggis] Lowball
Previous by thread: RE: [haggis] Rule and its negation
Next by thread: RE: [haggis] Prediction
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread