RE: [haggis] Haggis board 86

["Sullivan, William J" <wills@bu.edu>]

Mark,

For now I think the rules and the cards counts are at a decent level.  You may have to go back and change them in the future, but I think balancing is the next step.

Also I came up with a couple of ideas for rules:

-Can you make the value of a suit conditional? "if you have even # of blues they are worth 5 points otherwise worth -2" or "if you have less than 3 blues they are worth 3 points otherwise blues are worth 2 more than a red" 

-"The first player to submit gets 10 points"

-"The player with the least # of completed trades gets -10 points"

-"Special Combo: If your hand has at least 2 reds, 1 green, 1 yellow and you have no whites Combo Bonus points of 20"
 
-"fake rules"  example:
   Rule #2: "Each black, white pair is worth 5 points"
   Rule #6: "Rule #2 is a lie" (rule #2 awards no points) (scored by using negative of points gained from rule 2)

--Will

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-haggis-users@gamerz.net
[mailto:owner-haggis-users@gamerz.net]On Behalf Of mballinger@fibres.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 9:50 AM
To: haggis-users@gamerz.net
Subject: Re: [haggis] Haggis board 86


On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:50:30AM -0400, Reed, Jim wrote:
> 
> The code should be modified to ensure that each rule is owned by at least
> one person though.

Crap!  Yes.  This morning, before I turned on the computer I realized, "uh oh, I mis-distributed the rules!"

So, fix on the way.  In general, though, did we like the number of cards in this game?  And three rules per person?


To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
	unsubscribe haggis-users@gamerz.net
as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.