RE: [DL] Thoughts on Old Pete {Spoilers}

["Michael Maguire" <mikejmaguire@hotmail.com>]

I'm inclined to agree...  Stone is a significant element of the Deadlands 
setting, and it can be interesting to discuss him...  in a friendly fashion, 
of course. :-)

I sort of find these discussions of various systems interesting, to be 
honest, because different gamers bring many different outlooks on each 
version.  Personally, for Deadlands I am very much old school and love the 
original system, thus feeling no need to change.

In fairness to D20 systems, though, I openly admit that our group has been 
involved in an ongoing 3E D&D game since last September...

Mac






----Original Message Follows----
From: Allan Seyberth <darious@darious.com>
Reply-To: deadlands@gamerz.net
To: deadlands@gamerz.net
Subject: RE: [DL] Thoughts on Old Pete {Spoilers}
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 21:11:07 -0600



It was a good thread, a valid point, and the end result is that the actual 
role of Stone in campaigns is much better defined.
And the final and only truly valid point was that your players had a blast 
taking him down.

Thanks for the thread in the first place.



-------------------
Allan Seyberth
darious@darious.com

Superior, they said, never gives up her dead
When the gales of November come early!
                 -Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald


To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
	unsubscribe deadlands@gamerz.net
as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.



_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail