[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DL] a Question on Double Actions



On 5/8/02 5:14 PM, "Mr. Christopher McGlothlin, M.Ed."
<sosentinel@adelphia.net> wrote:

> At 07:41 PM 5/8/2002, Mr. Derek Carmichael wrote:
>> Huh?  Is this second edition?   If so, man, I gotta reread that puppy. :-)
>> (I thought you just had to roll "to hit" twice?  )
> 
>        As the Honorable Mr. Seyberth indicated, it's an *optional* rule,
> and the procedure your describe remains official.
>        I did propose making this optional rule the official one in LS,
> but this was vetoed by The Man himself. Therefore, an optional rule it is
> destined to remain.

Funny that.  Now that I reread Allan's post, I actually noticed the
"optional" part.  Doh!

Thanks for the heads up.

Derek