[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DL] a Question on Double Actions
On 5/8/02 5:14 PM, "Mr. Christopher McGlothlin, M.Ed."
<sosentinel@adelphia.net> wrote:
> At 07:41 PM 5/8/2002, Mr. Derek Carmichael wrote:
>> Huh? Is this second edition? If so, man, I gotta reread that puppy. :-)
>> (I thought you just had to roll "to hit" twice? )
>
> As the Honorable Mr. Seyberth indicated, it's an *optional* rule,
> and the procedure your describe remains official.
> I did propose making this optional rule the official one in LS,
> but this was vetoed by The Man himself. Therefore, an optional rule it is
> destined to remain.
Funny that. Now that I reread Allan's post, I actually noticed the
"optional" part. Doh!
Thanks for the heads up.
Derek