Re: [DL] Mad Scientists are so weak!

["Matt Maybray" <reginald_q_bumbershoot@hotmail.com>]

>>At 03:43 PM 5/7/2002, Mr. Patrick Downs wrote:
>>I hope I got somebody's attention with that subject
>>heading, because I have a bone to pick with this
>>particular Arcane Background (AB).
>>I don't really think the Mad Scientist is weak, so
>>much as I think the Mad Scientist is the least
>>powerful of the ABs.
>
>         (I'm snipping the rest of Mr. Downs' message because he makes some
>very good points that stand without further comment from me.)
>         Speaking just as a DL fan, I have always wanted to see a Mad
>Scientist book that *wasn't* just a gadget book; something more along the
>lines of _Hucksters & Hexes_ and _Fire & Brimstone_ that provide more
>options for the Archetype itself...and more cool stuff for them to do in
>general.
>         Just my CS$0.02...
>
>
>Deo Vindice,
>Mr. Christopher L. McGlothlin, M.Ed.
>
Yeah. The Collegium book had some good ideas, but not enough to make Mad 
Scientists stand on their own.

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com