Re: [DL] what if you think it's self-defence

["William Watson" <ericw@shelby.net>]

  Ahh, my favorite twist on torturing those pesky Blessed folks.
  After much deliberation I came up with the following resolution:
  The blessed gains a Crisis of Faith Hindrance at level 1 irregardless of
Hindrance requirements.  They can buy off the Hindrance as normal with
appropriate time for Theological Study or Faith Prayer and a Successfull
Sinin' roll BUT using their Theology or Faith.

But that was just my solution for a difficult situation.

William Eric Watson



> > >>have some bad guys disguise themselves as monsters or Walkin' dead or
> >something. when the blessed does a shot in the head and kills him, poof,
no
> >more bleesed powers.<<
> >
> >Sinnin' depends on the point of view of the Blessed, not the facts of the
> >situation.  If a Black Magician mind-controls a child, covers that child
> >with an illusion and sends her out to "attack" a Blessed who then kills
her
> >in "self-defense", no Sin has been committed (though the Blessed in
> >question will surely be buggered in the head over the situation).  The
> >Blessed was acting in what he thought in good faith to be self-defense.
If
> >humans are dressing as monsters to attack a Blessed, he can kill them in
> >self-defense (especially if he has no reason to suspect them of being
> >humans to begin with).
>
> This I think, could be subject to a lot of debate.  "Thou shalt not
> kill/murder" doesn't have the caveat, "unless you were tricked into it"
>
> In my opinion, at least
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
> unsubscribe deadlands@gamerz.net
> as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.
>
>