Re: [DL] what if you think it's self-defence

["William Ogden" <w_ogden@hotmail.com>]

>From: john tfs <johntfs1@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: deadlands@gamerz.net
>To: deadlands@gamerz.net
>Subject: Re: [DL] Gettting a player dead
>Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 21:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>
>   William Ogden <w_ogden@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>possible spoilers.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >>have some bad guys disguise themselves as monsters or Walkin' dead or
>something. when the blessed does a shot in the head and kills him, poof, no
>more bleesed powers.<<
>
>Sinnin' depends on the point of view of the Blessed, not the facts of the 
>situation.  If a Black Magician mind-controls a child, covers that child 
>with an illusion and sends her out to "attack" a Blessed who then kills her 
>in "self-defense", no Sin has been committed (though the Blessed in 
>question will surely be buggered in the head over the situation).  The 
>Blessed was acting in what he thought in good faith to be self-defense.  If 
>humans are dressing as monsters to attack a Blessed, he can kill them in 
>self-defense (especially if he has no reason to suspect them of being 
>humans to begin with).

This I think, could be subject to a lot of debate.  "Thou shalt not 
kill/murder" doesn't have the caveat, "unless you were tricked into it"

In my opinion, at least

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com