[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DL] Deadlands - Flagship vs. D20

To: deadlands@gamerz.net
Subject: Re: [DL] Deadlands - Flagship vs. D20
From: "Patrick Sniegoski" <shotrey@elhazard.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 23:53:09 -0500
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020302203845.009ebec0@mail.io.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020302203845.009ebec0@mail.io.com>
Reply-To: deadlands@gamerz.net
Sender: owner-deadlands@gamerz.net

On 2002-03-03 02:40:08 deadlands@gamerz.net was overheard saying:
---------------------------------------------------
> I admit to some curiosity why GURPS keeps getting ignored in this 
>discussion. Is it because it's not a PEG-published setting, because no 
>one here has bought the GURPS Deadlands materials, or what?
>
>(Yes, there's a bit of self-serving in this message, but I *am* 
>honestly perplexed.)

Probably because Pinnacle doesn't publish it and SJGames hasn't put out its version of the splatbooks yet...
 
---
Free Anime Email at AnimeNation.com - Anime Shopping ,Links, Forums, News, and more!

References:
- Re: [DL] Deadlands - Flagship vs. D20
  - From: Andrew Hackard <hackard@io.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [DL] Comments and Advice for a LS player? (spoilers)
Next by Date: [DL] Re: deadlands-digest.20020302-2
Prev by thread: RE: GURPS (WAS RE: [DL] Deadlands - Flagship vs. D20)
Next by thread: Re: [DL] Deadlands - Flagship vs. D20
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread