[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DL] Arguments against lynch law [OT[

To: deadlands@gamerz.net
Subject: Re: [DL] Arguments against lynch law [OT[
From: Allan Seyberth <darious@darious.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 12:57:13 -0600
In-Reply-To: <200104051412.f35ECul07518@www.gamerz.net>
References: <003d01c0bd9d$2e5dfac0$e85fbad5@cybercom.com.pl>
Reply-To: deadlands@gamerz.net
Sender: owner-deadlands@gamerz.net

 >Well, if he's that rotten, convince your players that lynching is too
 >good for him.  A quick death instead pf a longterm punishment that
 >would haunt him all the more.

All together now. . .

"Hangin's too good for 'im!
BURNIN's too good for 'im!
He should be torn into ITSY BITSY pieces and then BURIED ALIVE!!!!
Sternn!!!
STERNN!!!!
I'm going KILL you!"


-------------------
Allan Seyberth
darious@darious.com
Deadlands fan site - http://www.darious.com/

If you wou'd be reveng'd of your enemy, govern your self.
                 -Poor Richard's Almanac 1734

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [DL] Arguments against lynch law [OT[
  - From: "Nick Zachariasen" <zacharin@pluto.dsu.edu>

References:
- [DL] Arguments against lynch law
  - From: "TFM" <tfm@post.pl>
- Re: [DL] Arguments against lynch law
  - From: Ross Coburn <coburn@videotron.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: [DL] Henry's vs Winchester's
Next by Date: [DL] Listserv Archive?
Prev by thread: Re: [DL] Arguments against lynch law
Next by thread: Re: [DL] Arguments against lynch law [OT[
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread