Re: [DL] Adventures in supplements

[The Baron Samedi <baron11@netmcr.com>]

At 11:02 AM 11/6/2000, you wrote:
>In a message dated 11/4/2000 9:37:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>marshalron@hotmail.com writes:
>
>
>>I think the first instance of this was because the adventures in HOE were
>>not that good.  They were basicly run around for a while then fight big
>>harrowed version of whatever the book was about.  Some of the deadlands
>>ones
>>were quite good but they couldn't be expected to keep up that kind of
>>quality and still put out a good sourcebook.
>
>
>
>Actually, I don't think there's been a single harrowed anything in Hell on
>Earth (adventure-wise).


I think what he was talking about was the fact that BB pits you against a 
red zombie (undead Syker) and CoA pits you against a Doombringer (Undead 
Doomsayer)


>No, we decided to stop putting adventures in sourcebooks because you guys
>told us not to. Don't bother clogging up the list with your opinion, btw.
>It's been hashed, rehashed, voted on, and decided.
>
>Love ya all,

Yep.

>Shane


Jason,
Da Baron