[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [risk] Multiple attacks
Ok. I got one vote of confidence on the concept of multiple attacks.
That's enough encouragement to get me blathering for hours.
Here's what I propose: We add to the current move system an "all but
[some number of armies]", then allow multiple attacks. The shortest
notation I can think of would be negative numbers. so...
eus 1 -> wus would move one army into wus
eus -1 -> wus would leave one army in eus and move all others into wus.
combine this with multiple attacks and you've got mayhem - which in Risk
is a good thing.
Here's the big "for example"
+===+ ++===+=+====++ 4 | 2 | | +-----+
|ven| || |egy || rro | dpr | |
| 26| || naf | 15 || +-----+-+=+-+---+
|swi| || 7 |rro || | |mal|ngu|
+-+-+-+---++ || rro +----++=+===+ | 12| |
|per| ||-----|| | | |rro| |
| | bra || ++-+---+ eaf | +-+-+-+-+-+
| | 5 || |con| 1 +---+ |wau|eau|
+---+ dpr || | 1| dpr |mad| | 1| 1|
|arg| || |dpr| | 1| |rro|rro|
| 1+-----++ +-+-+-----+-+dpr| +---+---+
|swi| | saf | |
+---+ | 1 +-----+
| rro |
+-------+
In one turn, swi could send the following orders:
ven -1 -> per (would move 25 armies into per)
per -1 -> bra (would move 24 armies into bra, where they crush the evil
dpr. After the battle, they have 19 left.)
bra -5 -> naf (would move 14 armies into naf, where they meet rro. If
rro does not move any of egy into naf. swi wins naf and has 7 armies
left there. If rro moves 15 armies into naf, swi loses)
naf 2 -> con (If swi won the naf battle, this command would move 2
armies into con. If swi lost the naf battle, there would be no armies
to move into con and this command would be ignored.)
Well?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com