Re: [pyrnet] Feedback on Amimal Planet presentation on Pyrs?

["margaretGreiner" <Shadowman2001@msn.com>]

I agree they should have showed the pyr in different situations.Just because
they are guardian dogs .It also upset me with the mother ewe I felt that was
going along the lines of being cruel.On other list I belong to they say they
all introduce the dog to the sheep's gradually I felt that pup could have
received some serious injuries also.Has far has drooling went yes they can
drool mine will drool like the way they were showing when nervous or if food
is involved.On the overall I honestly felt it was just thrown together
without some real insight to just how wonderful this breed is.
Peggy
From: "Bonnie Trones" <closetothesky@webtv.net>
To: <pyrnet-l@pyrnet.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: [pyrnet] Feedback on Amimal Planet presentation on Pyrs?


> Hi All,
> As I was watching this program one of the thoughts I had was that they
> could have shown a small segment of these being more of a family dog as
> some of us have rather than just a guardian. I was also bothered by the
> fact that when I first got Sophie I commented on another list I
> previously belonged to that Sophie was a drooler. I received a strong
> letter and almost nasty response "if people wouldn't breed loose lipped
> to loose lipped this wouldn't happen". But in reality I hear alot of the
> list talking about drool. My sister called me and she saw so many of
> these dogs drooling that she commented " I guess Bonnie, they all drool
> by the way it looks!" I guess all this seems sort of petty but it sure
> would have been nice if they had discussed the personalities of these
> great dogs too. But what all can you get into a half hour show?
> Actually I thought they went into greater depth on the following
> "Newfie" show. I'll be anxious to read what others think!
> Bonnie--Sophie---Bear
>
> BE HAPPY!!!!!
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@pyrnet.org with
> unsubscribe pyrnet-l
> as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.
>
>
>