Re: [PyrNet-L] T.V. Commercial

["kdbooth" <kdbooth@mindspring.com>]

You're very brave for disclosing that on here!  I commend you.  I hope
you're not shredded too badly ;-)  I agree.  The commercial gives me the
warm fuzzies too.  Obviously the toddler and pooch are not unattended ...
someone is filming them.  My eight year old likes to put clothes, sun
glasses, hair clips, etc. on our dogs.  Mostly they lay there and enjoy the
attention.  When they're tired of it, they retreat ... often still wearing
an old t-shirt.


----- Original Message -----
From: Mike & Lynda <mikej@alaweb.com>
To: <pyrnet-l@gamerz.net>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 7:34 PM
Subject: RE: [PyrNet-L] T.V. Commercial


> >It would appear to me that some on here have never raised a little boy
and a
> dog at the same time. Having done so I can talk about this one.   If the
boy
> and dog in the commerical belong to each other the little boy could do
anything
> he wanted to do and the dog would either lay there and accept it or get up
and
> leave.  That is what, in my experience, smart dogs do. The commerical has
to
> be one of the funnest and best laundry detergent that has been one tv in a
long
> long time.
>
> Ken,
> >
> >It all started when I mentioned the new All commercial.  It has a toddler
> >playing with a shovel in the dirt, and a dog (looks like a Rottie) laying
> >next to the toddler.  The toddler picks up a shovel of dirt and tosses it
at
>
> >the dogs face. At one point, the dog gets up and leaves, then later
returns
>
> >only to "shovel" dirt on the child via its hind legs.  The point of the
> >commercial is that kids get dirty.  My frustration with this commercial
is
>
> >its lack of responsibility regarding the unattended child and dog, the
> >child's actions and the possible reaction of the dog.  The whole thing
has
>
> >absolutely nothing to do with a child getting dirty anyway, in my book.
> >
> >Carol Lugg
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-pyrnet-l@pyrnet.org [mailto:owner-pyrnet-l@pyrnet.org] On
Behalf
>
> >Of Ken McNamara
> >Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 1:57 PM
> >To: pyrnet-l@pyrnet.org
> >Subject: Re: [PyrNet-L] T.V. Commercial
> >
> >Sorry - but even checking my wastebasket I see that I've missed the
> >original message.
> >
> >Why the curiousity about All and Lever Brothers?
> >
> >KenMc
> >
> >Thomas Sheehan wrote:
> >>
> >> All is made by ------Lever Brothers Company
> >>                                 New York, N.Y. 10022---------1 800 598
> >5005
> >>
> >> OK GANG, go get em.
> >>
> >> Terry Rickert
> >> PS I thought the commercial was really terrible, as did my wife.
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Jennifer Warner <pyrjen@yahoo.com>
> >> To: <pyrnet-l@pyrnet.org>
> >> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 2:17 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [PyrNet-L] T.V. Commercial
> >>
> >> >
> >> > FYI The manufacturer of "All" is Unilever
> >> > Jenn
> >> > --- Barb Bowes <bamb@monmouth.com> wrote:
> >> > > I thought the manufacturer of All Laundry Detergent
> >> > > was Proctor
> >> > > and Gamble, but, after a search of their products,
> >> > > this does not
> >> > > seem to be the case. Will make a trip to the
> >> > > Supermarket to check
> >> > > if no one else comes up with the info beforehand.
> >> > >
> >> > > Barb Bowes
> >> > > Bo, Molly, Chelsea (Pyrs) & Flopsy (Pyr Shep)
> >> > > The more people I meet, the more I like my dog!
> >> > > bamb@monmouth.com
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@pyrnet.org
> >> > > with
> >> > > unsubscribe pyrnet-l
> >> > > as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > __________________________________________________
> >> > Do You Yahoo!?
> >> > Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
> >> > http://im.yahoo.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Mike & Lynda
>
>