Re: Re[4]: [PyrNet-L] Re: Size

[JGentzel@aol.com]

In a message dated 5/7/99 4:09:28 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
Steven.K.Slusser@osfhealthcare.org writes:

<<  I guess from here
      we need to define immense vs giant vs large vs ...  Thus, I guess
      that's why the "standard" has objective measures, 27 to 32 inches for
      males etc. yadda yadda yadda
 
      That's enough from my little corner of the peanut gallery. >>

Its probably just semantics and so subjective to not be worth the debate.  
Giant, massive, immense or whatever the breed should be large.

Joe