Re: [PyrNet-L] Pyr-related, FINALLY!

["Sally ." <sally9140@hotmail.com>]

This message is long, but it is well worth it.  For the first time, it 
will address some of the DOG related issues in the background.  I do not 
feel that I have betrayed any confidences as I understand the entire 
truth about the last "33" (which is more like 20-25) years is about to 
come out.

>From: Tigerlilly <tigerlilly71@yahoo.com>
>It was never my practice to register a client's domain
>under my own name, nor was it Victoria's practice

Ms. Lilly - it takes only a few moments of research on both of your 
sites and through the Internic database to see that "rivergroves.com" 
was the #FIRST# domain name registered by either of you.  When you 
intentionally distort such easily recognizable facts, your point is 
lost.

>From: Tigerlilly <tigerlilly71@yahoo.com>
>I witnessed that Victoria did receive a check from Jean Boyd for
>$100 for domain name registration.

That's incredible!  Around 50 webpages and domain name registration all 
for a low $100!  Your friend, Jean Boyd, must have gotten the deal of 
the century.  Prices like that just can't be beat -- almost makes you 
wonder how one could stay in business with such prices.  

Do you have any other information that helps prove Jean Boyd's 
well-detailed and believable side of the story?

Tim Parks mentioned that Jean Boyd is not on this list.  That is odd 
since I have seen her post here.  How could anyone try to paint Jean 
Boyd as a "victim"?  Jean Boyd has a history of using people and dogs to 
her full advantage and then setting out to destroy them when she is done 
with them. 

As someone else pointed out, Jean Boyd is famous for getting new and 
unknowledgeable people in the breed to do her "dirty work."  Perhaps 
these underlings should get their story straight before airing it in a 
public forum, or am I the only person that noticed the inconsistencies 
in Jennifer Young's and Tim Parks' emails?  For instance, in Jennifer 
Young's email, first Jean Boyd had no idea that the website would be in 
Victoria Coffman's name and then: "The owner of the kennel has made it 
clear that she would like her Domain name returned to her and placed 
within her name  - which was the original deal years ago."  Then Tim 
Parks writes in that the Coffmans were not part owners of the kennel, 
website, or domain name and then refers to them as "ex-partners."  So, 
which is it, folks?  Do either Tim Parks or Jennifer Young have any 
proof to go along with these accusations?  Or are they just repeating 
what has been fed to them?

Jen, instead of spewing someone else's venom, why don't you ask your 
breeder more about your new puppy.  I understand that you have a new 
"Supreme" Ch. Rivergroves You Be the Judge puppy.  Is this puppy for 
breeding, and, if so, did Jean Boyd tell you what to expect from future 
litters?  Did she mention what things to watch for from your puppy?  
Like, just for starters, did she mention that his MOTHER and TWO OF HIS 
SISTERS had epilepsy?  Did she mention that Supreme has a 50% chance of 
being a dwarf?  None of this is ringing a bell?  Well, she must have 
mentioned his worst problem of all then which makes all of the other 
problems pale by comparison.  Now, I'm not sure which litter you got a 
puppy out of -- but, if it was the Supreme and Mascara litter, did Jean 
mention that the mother is dysplastic and that the vet's puppy check 
diagnosed FIVE OF THE TEN with patella problems?????  No??  If it is a 
puppy from Supreme and Nayla, did she mention that there was luxating 
patella there too?  Perhaps, if you intend to breed your dog, you should 
start asking just exactly what kind of percentages of Supreme's puppies 
have been euthanized for luxating patella.  It's really astonishing and 
should show you point blank how everything this poor, helpless little 
victim, Jean Boyd, cares about the health of the dogs and the future of 
the breed.

I know I sleep safer at night just knowing that Jean Boyd is in charge 
of allowing or disallowing membership into the parent club.

Let me see if I've got this right now.  Jean Boyd goes to handling 
classes and then lunch every Wednesday with Nancy Coombs, who has been 
heard slandering one of the members involved at these functions.  Jean 
Boyd and the Coombs have been breeding together. White Coombs is one of 
the Board members who voted to uphold Jean's protest. hmmmmmmmm.... 
What's wrong with this picture?  Isn't this the same man who is in 
charge of Judge's Education?  Considering the facts that he put up a 
spook at a national specialty -- one who was so scared that his tail was 
tucked completely under him and his handler had to hold the dog's head 
against his leg -- and the fact that the Coombs are notorious for having 
scared dogs -- and the fact that "temperament is of the utmost 
importance" in this breed -- it does start to make you wonder just what 
it is that he might be teaching other judges.  And now, to top it all 
off, I understand that the good Whit Coombs has accepted a judging 
assignment which directly interferes with the general meeting at the 
national specialty.  How convenient.  Perhaps this is just an attempt to 
avoid facing the music, so to speak.

Tim, before you asked for enlightenment, you should have made sure that 
is what your client, Jean Boyd, truly wanted.  Oh well, too late now.  
And I'm sure that there is -- just oh soooo much -- more to come.  Jean 
Boyd is possibly the most unethical breeder of our time.  I look forward 
to all of the facts coming out.  Perhaps instead of telling other list 
members to take it offline, some will realize that the best thing that 
could ever happen to the dogs in Jean Boyd's care and the breed as a 
whole would be for the truth to come out!

What HAS happened to all of the people and dogs that Jean has been 
through?  How about some of her recent specials?  "Blue" Ch. Rivergroves 
Red White and Blue and "Chanel" Ch. Rivergroves Designer Label?  They 
were placed?  Oh, I see.  Once you start to pin Jean down on her 
stories, you will see that they unfold before your very eyes.  The truth 
is, "Blue" and "Chanel" were both euthanized.  What about Donna 
Ankerway, Jackie Bandi, Cheryl Grimshaw, Carol Doyle, Sharon Greenspun, 
and now the Coffmans.  Wouldn't you LOVE to know the real truth about 
their disappearances too?
More to come,
Sally (in case that was still not obvious to some of our slower members 
from my email address)
p.s.  Sorry in advance for any typos.
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com