Re: [PyrNet-L] Rumors and speculation

["Timothy M. Parks" <timparks@pacbell.net>]

>Now, Tim, if you had been breeding with your "client" for 20
>years and you had registered the domain name on your own, then your
>"client" made it clear that you as her partner were responsible for part of
>the expenses, then are you not also considered an owner?  

I would not recommend for anyone to become partners for this exact
reason.  Always in partnerships more is assumed than said.
Obviously there is only one owner of the kennel in question, right?
And this is the only kennel that website and domain name represent.
Writing a webpage and registering a domain name does not make you
an owner of the kennel.  Since the author is not an owner in the kennel,
why would she want to hang on to the website?

>If a club is to admit applicants solely on ethics, which according to the
>GPCA Constitution they are not, then membership should be based on the
>care, breeding and sale of Great Pyrenees, not domain names, etc.  I'm
>sure, if you read the GPCA Constitution, it is not the GPCA's duty to act
>as divorce court.

If this was the case, why did the board vote down the application?  
Are they so out of touch of their own Constitution?  Or is it that
you didn't like the outcome?

>Tim, you should be careful about repeating things that your new friend or
>client has told you, less you unwittingly include yourself in a slander
>suit.  In fact, you know so little about the parties involved, that on the
>"new" website (which is copied code and pictures, a copyright
>infringement), you left the Coffman's dogs on the website, including
>pictures of Victoria, my brother, my mother and me, which you have no
>permission to use!!!!

Everything used is by direction of the owner...  anything that doesn't 
belong needs to be taken off  so please email your thoughts.  I will 
take them up with the owner of the kennel.  But I am glad you visited 
the site...  :)  
The old website was made to represent the kennel, was it not?  Are there
plans in the making to have another kennel of the same name?  Is there
a reason to hold on to something as powerful as website which clearly
represents a kennel that you have no ownership of?  
Seems rediculous to me

Please don't try to intimidate with possible slander suits...  I know
better...  :)
I have no intention to slander anyone and you need to educate yourself 
of what slander is.

Tim Parks