Re: [PyrNet-L] Why ask why?

[pyreau@crosslink.net (Jack and Charlotte Perry)]

You wrote:
>. IT SEEMS TO ME
>THEY'RE LOOSING
>THE SUBSTANCE THEY ONCE HAD. 

I do agree with you that Pyrs should be able to do the work that they were
bred for but I disagree with you that most cannot.  I am continually amazed
at how Pyrs instinctively want to guard their flocks.  We delivered a rescue
dog found roaming the streets of Baltimore to a farm.  She fit in with the
sheep as though she had always lived there.  

The controversy as to size has been going on as long as we have been in the
breed (since the 1960s) and will no doubt continue. Still most breeders do
prefer a larger Pyr.  I personally think that the breed as a whole in this
country is not as small as it was 20 years ago. I think soundness has really
come a long way in those years - most Pyrs in the show ring today have few
movement faults. As to substance, I notice that you have Newfoundlands
(congratualations on your Westminster win!).  I wonder if you are comparing
Pyrs to Newfs.  Remember that a Pyr is not supposed to weigh as much or be
as heavy as a Newfouundland or a St. Bernard.  The coat may make the Pyrs
looks similar but they are not as heavy.

Just my 2 cents worth.
Charlotte