[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [pbmserv-dev] queued moves

To: pbmserv-dev@gamerz.net
Subject: Re: [pbmserv-dev] queued moves
From: Richard Rognlie <rrognlie@gamerz.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:08:57 -0400
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nowsp; d=gamerz.net; s=dk20040503;t=1127315338; h=Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To: User-Agent; b=KXErEPSyoR8OCMjqsS+Y10LBR5n3+Wk0o9s2wYVnclkgKPqFpas7H5F6RR62JLB6
In-reply-to: <20050921141324.635.qmail@web60417.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <jlirwufrmc.fsf@fester.home.rathkopf.net> <20050921141324.635.qmail@web60417.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: pbmserv-dev@gamerz.net
Sender: owner-pbmserv-dev@gamerz.net
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:13:23AM -0700, Shultz wrote:
> Yes. Definitely worth the effort. The new command
> should be qmove, since it takes me about ten minutes
> to look up how to spell queue.

Any of
	queue
	qmove
	moveq
	qboard
	boardq

will queue a move.   the normal move/board/mvoe commands will now reject
an out of turn move as an error (as it used to)

-- 
 /  \__  | Richard Rognlie / Sendmail Ninja / Gamerz.NET Lackey
 \__/  \ | http://www.gamerz.net/~rrognlie    <rrognlie at gamerz.net>
 /  \__/ | Creator of pbmserv@gamerz.net
 \__/    |                Helping reduce world productivity since 1994

References:
- Re: [pbmserv-dev] queued moves
  - From: Ted Rathkopf <ted-pbmserv-lists@rathkopf.net>
- Re: [pbmserv-dev] queued moves
  - From: Shultz <swift_4@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [pbmserv-dev] queued moves
Next by Date: Re: [pbmserv-dev] queued moves
Previous by thread: Re: [pbmserv-dev] queued moves
Next by thread: Re: [pbmserv-dev] queued moves
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread