[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pbmserv-dev] Wizard Hold'em
- To: pbmserv-dev@gamerz.net
- Subject: [pbmserv-dev] Wizard Hold'em
- From: Richard Rognlie <rrognlie@gamerz.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:29:11 -0400
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nowsp; d=gamerz.net; s=dk20040503;t=1126711751; h=Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:User-Agent; b=RZgXLsXfzNkTHhYo+92srJ+jlMvyFEDkfj0xCDb8xHWGJeLV/fV7+R/TQ8JZtI5P
- Reply-to: pbmserv-dev@gamerz.net
- Sender: owner-pbmserv-dev@gamerz.net
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
(what started as a side conversation in a wizard game has led me to...)
Wizard Hold'em. Texas Hold'em. But with a Wizard Deck.
wizards aren't "wild" per se. But they are useful.
they outrank aces. and are "any" suit. they'd help you make flushes.
Jesters are lower than 2s. and don't match any suit.
big slick becomes "WI Ax"
pocket Wizards become the absolute best deal (vs. Pocket Aces)
/methinks I have work to do. if only that pesky JOB thing didn't keep
getting in the way...
(oh, and it could lead to an ongoing Poker server... just disable Wizards
and jesters, if you want)
--
/ \__ | Richard Rognlie / Sendmail Ninja / Gamerz.NET Lackey
\__/ \ | http://www.gamerz.net/~rrognlie <rrognlie at gamerz.net>
/ \__/ | Creator of pbmserv@gamerz.net
\__/ | Helping reduce world productivity since 1994