Re: [pbmserv-dev] Re: Backgammon Standings

[Cameron Browne <cameronb@optusnet.com.au>]

> Look at lunkin.   he's #1.   unassailable.   and not accepting any
> challenges, either.
>
> I added code a while ago to not display players who are no longer in
> the player list.   I'm thinking about also not displaying players who
> are rejecting games and have no games active.

Yes! That's *really* bad sportsmanship. Over the years some players have 
really pissed me off doing this.

A player with no active games who rejects a challenge (or resigns on first 
move) should be removed from the standings until they complete a game.

Cameron