[HoE] Re: Templar Observation

[John Goff <johngoff@erols.com>]

Steve wrote:

> Well, I suggested it, so I'm glad we're in agreement.  :) My only concern
> is...well, he didn't actually get around to doing it.  As such, it seems to
> me like the Greater Reward deprivation (but with the eventual chance to
> redeem himself) and the Night Terrors are better, because they're more
> accurate reflections of what the Saints and the Templar's own subconscious
> know were in his heart, rather than what he actually, physically did.  Does
> that make sense...?

It sounds like there was a little more information behind the scenes than I was
aware of. In light of this, here's my _new_ take:

Since he was apparently involved in the final battle to defeat the monster--whether
or not he was a "supporter of the plan"--I think he is in line for the reward.

His solution was valid, especially given the fact child had arcane abilities beyond
that possessed by "normal" innocent children and had used them against the posse.

It doesn't sound like he even abandoned the posse (if he was actually fighting the
thing at the end as opposed to standing aside and catching a little incidental
damage). If that's so, Servitor mutations aren't even in line. If I understand the
situation, I'd let him off scott-free. If the rest of the posse has issue, that's
IC, not rules.

However, there are a number of interps of the Templars' creed--as evidenced by the
range of Saints. You've noted St. Stern, but have failed to mention St. Hise or St.
Gates--both of whom seem nearly opposite in outlook. I understand your point about
conflicting messages in the SB, but they're intentional. Templars walk a _very_ fine
line between the heroic sacrifices of St. Hise and St. Gates and the pragmatism of
St. Stern. Stray too far one way and you die needlessly, stray too far in the other
and you wind up a callous-hearted servitor.

As an analogy (the weakest form of argument, BTW <g>), I am conservative in many of
my political viewpoints--however, I still think Fascism is a BAD THING (tm).

The sacrifice of innocents required for St. Stern's blessing may also push the
Templar down the road toward the Reckoners as well, unless the character is
_extremely_ careful, IMHO.

That's my take, for what it's worth,

John Goff