RE: [DL] One Eye Hindrance?

["coyote" <coyote@net-link.net>]

Having one eye is pretty bad, just as Leela from Futurama. :)

If memory serves there _was_ a One Eye hindrance from the 1st ed. but that
might be the peyote talkin'.

New Hindrance:

One Eye (4)

Your hero is of the cycloptic variety meaning he lost the use of one eye to
misfortune or injury. If he's Ugly as Sin what's left of the eye is either
an  empty scarred up socket or a milky ruined mess. If you're Purty then you
probably wear an eye patch which grants a degree of rakish charm. Because of
your affliction have problems judging distances. For the purposes of ranged
combat, i.e. bow, shootin', and throwin' aptitudes double all ranges before
applying the range increment. Also, when attacked from your "blind-side" in
melee your hero does not include his/her fightin' aptitude levels for the
purposes of TN determination.

Or some such...

Happi trailz,

>>Joseph C. Wolf

--
Joseph C. Wolf
Freelance Designer-Developer



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-deadlands@gamerz.net [mailto:owner-deadlands@gamerz.net]On
Behalf Of Reemull
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 03:41 AM
To: deadlands@gamerz.net
Subject: [DL] One Eye Hindrance?


Anyone know if there is a hindrance in any of the Weird West books that
involves a character only having one eye?

I had a look at Hank Ketchums profile - however there is nothing there.
 If the worst comes to the worst I'll just rate it as the same as Bad
Eyes (3) and give the -2 to all ranged/distance actions.

Thanks

Roy





___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com


To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
	unsubscribe deadlands@gamerz.net
as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.