[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DL] Question about the tempest

To: deadlands@gamerz.net
Subject: Re: [DL] Question about the tempest
From: Allan Seyberth <darious@darious.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:56:24 -0700
In-Reply-To: <F16229VRpOlfpQwMiwk0001496d@hotmail.com>
References: <F16229VRpOlfpQwMiwk0001496d@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: deadlands@gamerz.net
Sender: owner-deadlands@gamerz.net
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1

> It needs to be something that can be a definite liability if (when) it is 
> cast at a less than opportune time.  The whole drawback of being a tempest 
> is that you run the risk of ripping of a hex as an involuntary reaction to a
> 
> failed surprise check.  If that just makes you, say, accidentally 
> corporeally tweak yourself, where is the liablity?  Now texas twister, or 
> firestorm, thats more like it...

Who says you have to corporeal tweak /yourself/ when you pop one off?

"Joe?"
"Yeah."
"Did those zombies just get bigger?"
"Yeah.  Why?"
"Just saying."



-- 
Allan Seyberth
darious@darious.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [DL] The Rest of the smoker <Shane>
  - From: Allan Seyberth <darious@darious.com>

References:
- Re: [DL] Question about the tempest
  - From: "Joe Kaczmarek" <kilgore_the_mad@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [DL] Hexslinger vs Shootist
Next by Date: Re: [DL] The Rest of the smoker <Shane>
Prev by thread: Re: [DL] Question about the tempest
Next by thread: Re: [DL] The Rest of the smoker <Shane>
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread