Re: [DL] Hexes in the book

[Bryce Perry <sandchigger@yahoo.com>]

We've always treated it as drawing the next nearest hand "rounded"
down.  I.E. if the hex has a listing for two pairs then goes to
straight, and the Huckster draws three of a kind, treat it as two
pairs.  If the patient draws Jacks, and there's no listing for Jacks
treat it as a pair.  And so on, and so forth...

--- Jeff Shoffner <shoffner@esper.com> wrote:
> Okay, maybe I'm missing an errata page, or didn't notice an addendum
> somewhere, but I've been working on something with the hexes in
> Hucksters &
> Hexes, & I'm starting to notice there are gaps in the Hands chart for
> some
> of the hexes.  Can anyone clue me in where they fixed this (if they
> did?)
> I've pulled the DL list of rulings, but there is no mention of it
> there.  It
> is almost like the writer was working up the charts the first time, &
> didn't
> know what Hands were going to be used, & then forgot to revise all of
> them
> later.  (Fer instance, a few of the hexes do not mention the Jacks
> hand, but
> skip onto Two Pair, then Three ofa Kind, Straight, then nothing
> else.)
> 
> Jeff S
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
> 	unsubscribe deadlands@gamerz.net
> as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com