[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GURPS (WAS RE: [DL] Deadlands - Flagship vs. D20)

To: deadlands@gamerz.net
Subject: Re: GURPS (WAS RE: [DL] Deadlands - Flagship vs. D20)
From: Allan Seyberth <darious@darious.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 00:21:47 -0700
In-reply-to: <MABBJPNOLKEJBFCMHGAGMEKMCFAA.mmdeforrest@worldnet.att.net>
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020302203845.009ebec0@mail.io.com>
Reply-To: deadlands@gamerz.net
Sender: owner-deadlands@gamerz.net

 >I'm also quite happy with the miniatures.  They are attractive and very
 >user-friendly for Deadlands.  There are GURPS stats for all the minis ripe
 >for conversion.  The Steampunk ones are fairly obvious -- a pair of
 >adventurers (male and female), a mad scientist or two, a pair of automatons,
 >someone augmented with buzzsaws instead of hands, and a clockwork cat ready
 >for deployment in...well, your Marshall will know where.

What scale are they in?

-------------------
Allan Seyberth
darious@darious.com
Deadlands fan site - http://www.darious.com/

Of all the people I know, you're one of them

Follow-Ups:
- RE: GURPS (WAS RE: [DL] Deadlands - Flagship vs. D20)
  - From: "Matthew M. DeForrest" <mmdeforrest@worldnet.att.net>

References:
- Re: [DL] Deadlands - Flagship vs. D20
  - From: Andrew Hackard <hackard@io.com>
- GURPS (WAS RE: [DL] Deadlands - Flagship vs. D20)
  - From: "Matthew M. DeForrest" <mmdeforrest@worldnet.att.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [DL] Deadlands - Flagship vs. D20
Next by Date: Re: [DL] Comments and Advice for a LS player?
Prev by thread: GURPS (WAS RE: [DL] Deadlands - Flagship vs. D20)
Next by thread: RE: GURPS (WAS RE: [DL] Deadlands - Flagship vs. D20)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread