Re: [DL] Black Circle Errata [PEG]

[Patrick Downs <knick_nevin@yahoo.com>]

Then all of the dates should say 1878, because the way
each entry is written it would seem like they are
written within the span of a few days.
For instance, the Feb 18th (1877) entry ends with the
author finding a note. The next Feb 28th entry (1878!)
starts with him mentioning his new lead because of
finding the note. Also, his location doesn't change
wildly. He's still in the deep south. 
He spent a year in the south without being able to
follow up this lead? Come on!
I'd like to hear from someone official (Nick, you're
not listed in the credits of the book, so I'm not
going to take your word for it) are these dates
supposed to all say 1878? or are they correct as is?
-doc

--- Nick Zachariasen <zacharin@pluto.dsu.edu> wrote:
> > I think what Mr. Hanson was referring to was that
> the
> > Posse section is a Tombstone Epitaph article. The
> date
> > for the article is 1877. The dates written in the
> > article jump from Jan 12th, '76 to Jan. 23rd, '77,
> > then later on jump from Feb. 18th, '77 to Feb.
> 21st,
> > '78, then the article ends on May 6th, '78
> > but it's atill an 1877 Edition article.
> >
> > Now I want to know, what gives?
> > Are these dates REALLY correct?
> > Is there an erratta for Black Circle?
> 
> It's supposed to say 1878 up at the top.  There was
> just a slight editing
> cock-up.
> 
> Nick Zachariasen
> Editor Emeritus
> Trojan Times


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/