[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Re: [DL] The Lord of the Rings [OT]]
well, they considered the bible a step above fact. again, this is a select
group of people, so don't flame me. : )
and you left out dinosaurs and evloution.
and,,,,,, wait. can we just let this end? i've had some bad experiances
with a specific group of individuals. that's it. I just don't understand
fanatics is all, so can we just drop this subject and get back to
deadlands??? or at least tolkien. : )
----- Original Message -----
From: <toadpooka@juno.com>
To: <deadlands@gamerz.net>
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [DL] The Lord of the Rings [OT]]
> Hmmmm, I think you're slightly off here on a couple points:
> 1) Everything in the Bible has to BE factual, down to the most literal
> interpretation.
> 2) Even things that ARE factual can be considered outright lies, if they
> condtradict Number One (ie, the world being round, carbon-dating,
> continental drift, Indians).
>
> > > --- doyle erin west <westfam@the-i.net> wrote:
> > > > This will be my last comment on it as well.
> > > > White southern babtist school. if it werent the
> > > > bible, and wasn't factual,
> > > > it wasn't acceptable. Fantasy and fiction fell
> > > > under the catagory of "out
> > > > right lies" just as a clarification of their
> --
> From Whom It May Concern,
> Rich Ranallo
> "Long live the legend, it'll outlive us"
> -Violent Femmes, "Death Drugs"
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
> Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
> Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
> unsubscribe deadlands
> as the BODY of the message. The SUBJECT is ignored.
>