[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DL] The order of things

To: <deadlands@gamerz.net>
Subject: Re: [DL] The order of things
From: "Ben Marshall" <ben@marshall48.fsnet.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 00:05:25 +0100
References: <LPBBIFMLCJBGBMIMELMLMEDECGAA.mmdeforrest@worldnet.att.net>
Reply-To: deadlands@gamerz.net
Sender: owner-deadlands@gamerz.net


Matt wrote
> Part two of the Fortress of Fear works better if run before Ghost Busters.
>

I must admit i`m very keen to run the Fortress of fear trilogy the only
thing which is putting me off is part three...i`m aware that this scenario
has attracted a variety of reviews, whilst I like the idea of a link to HOE
i`m not quite sure it will work within the boundaries of my present
campaign.
My question is, how feasible is it to run parts I and II without the third?

Ben

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [DL] The order of things
  - From: "John Goff" <JohnGoff@deadlands.com>

References:
- RE: [DL] The order of things
  - From: "Matthew M. DeForrest" <mmdeforrest@worldnet.att.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [DL] Scenarios
Next by Date: [DL] Re: Colour scheme of ironclads
Prev by thread: RE: [DL] The order of things
Next by thread: Re: [DL] The order of things
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread