[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DL] Army Ranks (modern) (was: Question on Army Rank)

To: deadlands@gamerz.net
Subject: Re: [DL] Army Ranks (modern) (was: Question on Army Rank)
From: Ivan Ironsword <nbouqu1@gl.umbc.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:50:26 -0400
References: <7B5F4A3DED02D411B49B0000E889ECB70186DF4E@UMC-MAIL02> <4.3.2.7.0.20000627102459.00b22c58@pop.nmia.com>
Reply-To: deadlands@gamerz.net
Sender: owner-deadlands@gamerz.net



Allan Seyberth wrote:

>  >WRONG! USMC Commandant is a 4 Star General. The USMC is the only service
> branch
>  >to never have had a 5-Star General, an the only reason we created the 5-Star
>  >rank is so that our commanders were not out ranked by the likes of that ass
>  >Field Marshal Montgomery.
>
> Well,
>         That would put you right there with the Coast Guard then - the only other
> active branch to not have a five star rank.  :-)
>

The Coasties are NOT a part of the Military during peace time! They are a part of the
Department of Transportation.

Nick

References:
- [DL] Army Ranks (modern) (was: Question on Army Rank)
  - From: "Heivilin, Jim" <banzai@missouri.edu>
- Re: [DL] Army Ranks (modern) (was: Question on Army Rank)
  - From: Allan Seyberth <darious@darious.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [DL] Question on Army Rank [OT]
Next by Date: RE: [DL] Army Ranks (modern) (was: Question on Army Rank)
Prev by thread: Re: [DL] Army Ranks (modern) (was: Question on Army Rank)
Next by thread: RE: [DL] Army Ranks (modern) (was: Question on Army Rank)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread