[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DL] Cardstock Cowboys and WebRPG (SHANE)



Just to pass the buck, legal stuff like this should probably be reflagged
for Shane. When it comes to this stuff, I'm a complete idiot.

Well, often, I'm a complete idiot anyway, but that's most often true when it
comes to the business/legal side of stuff.

;-)

Shane's going to be away from the computer for a couple of days or so in all
likelihood, though, so I wouldn't expect an answer for a little bit.

John

> This is just reflagged for John's attention.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Holmes" <danielh@dakcs.com>
> To: <deadlands@gamerz.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 9:39 PM
> Subject: [DL] Cardstock Cowboys and WebRPG
>
>
> > I am thinking of starting a WebRPG game since one of our group is moving
> > away, and we don't want to stop/change the game we are playing.  We
> currently
> > use PEG's minis to speed up combat (for large battles, we switch to GRW
> > rules).  For WebRPG, scanned in Cardstock Cowboys would probably be
> perfect,
> > however, I want to know the legal ramifications of using them.  If need
> be,
> > I'd make sure everyone in our group would buy a copy, and of course,
only
> > our group would have access to the scanned versions. I could also draw
> > suitable replacements, but the CC are just so cool...
> >
> > Any thoughts from the listserv, or should I retag this for John's
> attention?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dan
> >
> > --
> > Daniel D Holmes, N7NKR               I'net: danielh@dakcs.com
> > Standard disclaimers apply wherever you can find a sticky spot.
> > "OK, your liver, two sheep, and a grain" --
> >                      Chevan Nanayakkara, during a game of Settlers of
> Catan
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
> > unsubscribe deadlands
> > as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
> unsubscribe deadlands
> as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.
>