Magician, first of all I agree with david. Some times your posts make no sense at all. Try and check what your sending before you post just so others have some idea about what you're saying. Secondly, Caiman City, while something of a group effort, is still Arne's site - what he wants to put on his site is his choice. We can all make suggestions and 90 % of the time he puts up what most of us decide. ( ahem , arne I'll get that reporter done soon promise ) However, as I said, in the end it is still his site do with as he pleases.
So unless you have an idea that he agrees with, I wouldn't start making demands about the content of his, or anyone elses, site.
Finally, does anyone else out there have the stretch package - I am dieing to get a hold of it as my local supplier of all things BNW hasn't got Crescent City in there yet. Please, please, please, with a cherry on top ?
Cheers,
Cameron Twine
>From: David Fryer
>Reply-To: bnw@gamerz.net
>To: bnw@gamerz.net
>Subject: Re: [BNW] My thoughts on Caiman City
>Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 07:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Please explain what you mean. This is a problem with
>many of your postings. In order for us to disccuss
>your ideas and suggestions in a meaningful way you
>need to be clear about what you mean and express your
>thoughts clearly.
>
>--- Magician wrote:
> > We got to keep Brave New World alive, So here are my
> > thoughts on the Caiman
> > City project. It needs to be retooled,
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net
> > with
> > unsubscribe bnw
> > as the BODY of the message. The SUBJECT is ignored.
> >
>
>
>=====
>"Hey there's the entrance to the dungeon that the GM spent
>weeks putting together. Let's see what's down the road."
>Seen in a Gaming Magazine
>
>ICQ# 89314604
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
>
>
>To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
> unsubscribe bnw
>as the BODY of the message. The SUBJECT is ignored.
>