Re: [BNW] Gunner Question

[Charles Little <infinite@infinite-visions.com>]

>    The problem I see with this is that it means it is possible to say that 
> one power is superior to another.  By this I mean that a Gunner can with one 
> part of his power negate the main power of a Tough which to me makes no sense.
>    After all if they could ignore natural armor then why do they need AP ammo?
> 
Why is that a problem?  If you say that he can't, then you are saying that
the Tough's power is stronger than the Gunner's primary power...