[BNW] Dissastifaction - A more useful subject line then bnw-digest.19990926

["Seyberth, Allan" <Darious@email.tvi.cc.nm.us>]

>> I agree with your sentiments about the playability of the game, but no
>>  reason to ask someone to leave the sandbox, just 'cause he doesn't share
>> your   appreciation for the toys.
>>  
>I didn't ask him to leave, I merely was curious as to why, if he was never 
>going to buy any PEG products again, nor run BNW, he was still so involved 
>with the list.  If I don't like a game I generally shrug, put it back on my

>shelf and mark it up to experience.  I don't harp about it endlessly to 
>people who happen to enjoy said game.
>BNW has it's faults, it's far from perfect, and while these need to be 
>addressed Mr. Silverman's complaints are a matter of his personal taste,
not 
>some concrete flaws with the books, or PEG marketing.

Well - actually, you did invite him to leave.

If I may commit the error of possibly putting words in someone's mouth. . .
I believe that the reason he is staying is because "Sidhain"
<sidhain@Earthlink.net> is not QUITE ready to pitch the whole game out of
the window.

I think he wanted Brave New World to work, bought it, and found some things
that he thinks are critical flaws.

He's mentioned the things he dislikes and has had some constructive ideas
handed back to him - and has had Matt give him the ultimate money back
guarantee.  

Now - in my opinion - everyone has said their points, and now both sides are
sounding as if they are more interested in arguing each other's posts, then
in discussing each other's points.